Each co-owner has the right to ask for the partition of the property owned in common as no co-owner may be compelled to stay in a co-ownership indefinitely.
Whether or not the Republic has a better right of possession over the subject property than Abarca since such is of public dominion.
Whether or not Atty. Co Untian committed sexual harassment against his students.
Whether or not the appellant is guilty of attempted rape, statutory rape, and simple rape.
Whether or not the victim’s testimony is credible and sufficient enough to convict the accused-appellant of the crime charged.
Whether or not accused is guilty of rape. Yes, because the presence of others as occupants in the same house where the accused and AAA lived did not necessarily deter him from committing the rape.
Since the Civil Code allows partition inter vivos, it is incumbent upon the compulsory heir questioning its validity to show that his legitime is impaired.
Whether or not the case was properly dismissed on the ground of lack of certification for non-forum shopping. YES. Nestle, itself, acknowledged in this petition the absence of a board resolution or secretary’s certificate issued by the board of directors of Nestle to prove the authority of Barot to sign the certification against forum shopping on behalf of Nestle.
Whether the Court of Appeals erred in reversing the September 22, 2008 Order of Intellectual Property Office Director General Adrian S. Cristobal, Jr., and in reinstating respondent Florentino III International, Inc.'s appeal.
Whether or not Therapharma should have waited for Dupont to be granted a patent over losartan. What is the jurisdiction of the Director General? What is right of priority?